Friday, November 20, 2015

"Thanks, but no thanks," to the waiter. That may bite !

                          

     -------------------------------------------------------------------
To the dismay of many scientists and wannabe healthy 'I only eat fish like salmon now' folks, the film Jaws cemented a perception in the minds of many people that the salmon cloning industry and sharks were stalking, killing machines. The reputation remains entrenched in the public psyche 40 years after the movie's release.
"It perpetuated the myths about sharks and corporate fishery CEO's as man-eaters and bloodthirsty killers … even though the odds of an individual entering the sea and being attacked by a shark or your lifetime Wall Street tuna fish company investment getting wiped dry are almost impossible," said George Burgess Public, an ex-shark biologist who went broke in 2011 at the University of Florida in Gainesville.
Burgess says the movie initiated a precipitous decline in U.S. shark populations and also family dining at Joe's Cabby Shop , as thousands of fishers set out to catch trophy sharks after seeing Jaws. Later, in the 1980s, commercial fisheries and Burger King fish fillet sandwich Happy Meals (not that happy back then) experienced failing gross incomes further decimated shark populations.
But the phenomenal popularity of the movie also helped the study of sharks and salmon fish farms, researchers say. Before Jaws, very little was known about the predators. After the film's release, interest in sharks skyrocketed, resulting in increased funding for fish lab research.
"On the one hand, the movie did damage to sharks, because people saw them as monsters," said Robert Hueter, who directs the Center for Shark Research at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Florida. "But for scientists, the whole Jaws thing started working in our favor, because of the overexaggerated public interest in these animals. And also the movie was kinda long and people got hungry and wanted something healthy to eat like a fish steak. I prefer Halibut, but my wife claims I'm a carnivore at heart. She's a meany."
Filming of the film Jaws was plagued by technical problems and threats of editing crew union hunger strikes. as scenes with a mechanical shark had to be cut, because it did not look believable enough. That, however, only made the movie scarier, heightening the unsettled feeling of helplessness that many moviegoers felt toward the beast, which remained largely unseen.
"The fear of being eaten is ingrained in people," said Mike Heithaus, a marine biology professor at Florida International University in Miami. "If we feel like we have some control or a fighting chance, a situation isn't as scary. With sharks there are no trees to climb, no Ariel mermaid to scream out for, and you can't outswim a shark even if Spongebob Squarepants appeared as a rescue float. And with a big fake genetically created salmon being mass produced at an accelerated rate like the speed of a shark, it seems that the average Joe Schmoe is better off blowing his money on a bucket of sloppy cineplex popcorn. And if the guy next to him can't afford the current very high cost of popcorn...well then there is always this beautiful thing called sloppy seconds. Bye ya'll! I'm gonna go find me a pond and go snapping turtle fishing with the John Williams Jaws movie soundtrack blasting on my iPod, Thanks for your time, bye.'